メインコンテンツまでスキップ

巨大三角形型 UFO の謎

· 約86分
gh_20250915_tri1.jpg

前置き​

以前、ケーブル TV で放映された、"UFO Hunters"シリーズから "Giant Triangle UFOs Gold...(skip)" と題された動画を AI で整理した。

この動画の冒頭に上のような真昼に動画撮影された巨大三角形形 UFO の映像――始めの部分は同期が酷く乱れているので実質、2秒間（48フレーム）連続撮影映像――が登場している。これがこの動画の目玉となっており、映像分析の専門家も登場して、

  1. ‌‌映像分析‌‌
    • これまでの三角形UFOの映像は夜間に撮影されたものばかりでしたが、今回は‌‌昼間に撮影された巨大な三角形の珍しい映像‌‌（マーク・オルセンの映像）が手に入り、その分析が調査の中心となっています。
    • 画像分析スペシャリストのテレンス・メイソンが、モーション・トラッキング・ソフトウェアを使用して映像を分析しています。彼はマーク・オルセンの昼間の映像の3つのライトを分離・安定化させ、フレームごとに分析しました。
    • 分析の結果、ライトが「完全に固定された編隊」であることが確認され、精密なアクロバット飛行でも見られるような相対的な動きがないことが指摘されました。
    • さらに、画像処理ルーチンを実行したところ、3つのライトの背後と間に‌‌構造物がはっきりと示唆され‌‌、「黒い三角形」が確認されました。これは通常の露出補正によるものではなく、一貫した固体の物体であると結論付けられています。この結果は、1989年にベルギーで撮影された映像が、ライトを保持する「物理的な物体、三角形」を映し出していたことと類似しているとされています。

と主張している。残念ながら、この分析結果は間違っている。どこがどのように間違っているのか、その具体的な根拠を後日、別記事で示す予定。

要旨​

AI

飛行する三角形の謎

この音源では、‌‌飛行する三角形型UFO‌‌に関する議論が展開されます。研究者たちは、‌‌目撃証言‌‌、‌‌歴史的記録‌‌、そして‌‌独自の現地調査‌‌を通じて、これらの未確認飛行物体の起源と性質を明らかにしようとしています。

特に、‌‌古代の遺物に見られる三角形のデザイン‌‌と、‌‌現代の目撃情報‌‌との関連性、またカリフォルニアの「トライアングルアレー」と呼ばれるUFO多発地帯での‌‌昼間撮影された映像の分析‌‌に焦点が当てられています。懐疑的な意見も交えつつ、‌‌地球外生命体の関与‌‌や‌‌超高速の飛行能力‌‌といった可能性が検討されています。

最終的には、‌‌航空力学を理解していた古代文明‌‌の存在や、‌‌UFOが金などの資源に引き寄せられている‌‌という仮説までが議論の対象となります。

目次​

  1. 前置き
  2. 要旨
  3. 全体の俯瞰
    1. 1. 飛行する三角形の目撃情報の増加と特徴
    2. 2. 飛行する三角形の正体に関する議論と分析
    3. 3. 「トライアングルアレー」とその周辺の特異性
    4. 4. 古代の飛行物体と時間旅行の可能性
    5. 5. 目撃者の証言と軍の関与
    6. 6. 結論と今後の課題
  4. 目撃情報に見られる特徴
  5. 有名な事例
  6. 調査と分析
  7. 時系列
  8. 主要関係者
  9. 情報源
  10. 文字起こし（話者識別）

全体の俯瞰​

AI

詳細ブリーフィングドキュメント：飛行する三角形の謎

主要テーマと重要なアイデア

このブリーフィングドキュメントは、提供された情報源「飛行する三角形の謎」からの抜粋に基づき、未確認飛行物体（UFO）の、特に「飛行する三角形」に焦点を当てた調査における主要なテーマ、重要なアイデア、および事実をレビューするものです。

1. 飛行する三角形の目撃情報の増加と特徴​

  • 現代のUFO目撃の主流: 過去の「空飛ぶ円盤」の目撃とは対照的に、現在では「巨大で、静かで、信じられないほど速い」黒い三角形の物体が頻繁に目撃されていることが指摘されています。「人々はもはや空飛ぶ円盤をほとんど見ません。何を見ると思いますか？この大きな黒い物体が近づいてくるのを見ます。これらは巨大で、静かで、一部の目撃者は信じられないほど速いと言います。」(00:00:05)

  • 夜間の目撃が主、しかし日中の映像も出現: ほとんどの「飛行する三角形」の映像は夜間に撮影されていますが、「巨大な三角形の日中の驚くほど珍しい映像」がカリフォルニアの「トライアングルアレー」と呼ばれる地域で発見されました。(00:00:31, 00:04:16)

  • 特異な飛行特性: 目撃された三角形の物体は、「ホバリングし、静止し、姿を消し、マッハ5、マッハ8で飛び去る」能力を持つとされ、従来の航空機では不可能な動きをすることが強調されています。(00:02:08)

  • 世界的な現象: 1989年のベルギー、1997年のアリゾナ州フェニックス、2004年のイリノイ州ティンリーパークなど、世界各地で巨大な三角形の目撃情報が報告されています。(00:03:52)

2. 飛行する三角形の正体に関する議論と分析​

  • 地球の軍事機説: 機械エンジニアのケビン・クックは、これらの物体が「誰も見たことのないハイテク軍用機」である可能性を主張しています。過去のステルス爆撃機の事例を挙げ、「同じことが今、異なる実験機で再び起こっているのかもしれません。必ずしもエイリアンであるとは限りません。」(00:01:57, 00:02:15)

  • エイリアン/地球外起源説: 他の調査員は、その異常な速度や操縦能力から、「これらが地球製であるはずがない」と主張し、エイリアンとの関連性を強く示唆しています。(00:01:04, 00:02:08)

  • 映像分析による検証: マーク・オルセンが撮影した日中の映像は、画像アナリストのテレンス・マッソンによって分析されました。彼の分析結果は、「3つのライトの背後と間に構造があることを明確に示しています」と述べ、「単一の三角形の形をした暗い機体で、3つの非常に大きな推進または照明用のライトがあると思われます。これは、いかなる人工的な機体とも一致しません。」(00:09:06, 00:10:18)

    • この分析は、ベルギーの映像と同様に「3つのライトが三角形の形で配置され、物理的な物体がそれらのライトを保持している」可能性を支持しています。(00:07:33)

3. 「トライアングルアレー」とその周辺の特異性​

  • カリフォルニアのUFOホットスポット: シエラネバダ山脈周辺、特にソノラからシャスタ山まで続く350マイルの地域は「トライアングルアレー」として知られ、多数の三角形UFOの目撃報告があります。(00:10:29, 00:15:44)

  • 軍事基地との関連性: 「トライアングルアレー」の近くには、エリア51やトノパー空軍基地といった「ブラックバジェット基地」があり、これが軍事機のテスト飛行と関連している可能性も示唆されています。(00:16:00)

  • 金と地下洞窟の仮説: 地元ウフォロジストのルーベン・ウリアルテは、この地域が「ゴールドカントリー」であり、広大な地下洞窟システムが存在することに注目しています。彼は、「金には非常に高い導電性があります」と述べ、「これらの三角形を飛ばしているのが誰であろうと、何であろうと、金に興味があるのかもしれない」という仮説を立てています。(00:18:27, 00:18:29)

    • この仮説に基づき、調査チームは金鉱で放射線と磁気レベルを測定しましたが、異常な数値は検出されませんでした。(00:25:21, 00:25:56)

4. 古代の飛行物体と時間旅行の可能性​

  • 古代遺物との類似性: ジョルジオ・ツォウカロスは、コロンビアで発見された1500年前の「戦闘機のような」古代の遺物を紹介しました。この遺物は「生物学的に見て鳥ではない」特徴（翼が肩帯に付いていない、垂直尾翼がある）を持ち、現代の航空機設計と類似していると主張されています。(00:21:09)
  • 古代文明の知識: この遺物の模型を専門家が作成し、飛行試験を行ったところ、「見事に飛行した」ことが確認されました。これにより、「古代の人々が航空力学や飛行機械、あるいは地球外の乗り物に関する知識を持っていた可能性」が浮上しました。(00:40:35, 00:41:04)
  • 時間旅行の仮説: ビル・バーンズは、古代の三角形の飛行物体が「未来からの時間船」であるという大胆な仮説を提唱しています。これは「古代の宇宙飛行士が地球を訪れ、文明に情報を植え付けた」という可能性、あるいは「未来から来た飛行する三角形が過去に戻り、過去を播種した」という考えです。(00:23:05, 00:28:12, 00:41:35)

5. 目撃者の証言と軍の関与​

  • パイロットの証言: 40年以上の飛行経験を持つマイク・ダシックは、1996年5月18日に「3つの赤いライトと非常に小さな三角形」を目撃しました。彼はその速度が「SR-71よりもはるかに速かった」と証言し、訓練で識別したどの航空機とも異なると断言しています。「私が目撃したものは、これまでの人生で見た中で最も異常なものでした。かつては宇宙人が地球を訪れているとは信じていませんでしたが、今は信じています。」(00:30:36, 00:31:06, 00:32:38)
  • F-16の出現: ゴードン・スコットは、巨大な黒い三角形を目撃した数分後に武装したF-16戦闘機が「それを追いかけるのではなく、護衛するように飛んでいた」と証言しました。このF-16は、NASAのジョンソン宇宙センターの方向へ向かっていた三角形を追っていたと推測されています。(00:34:42, 00:35:12, 00:35:27)
  • 逆行工学/共同開発の可能性: F-16の関与は、政府がこれらの三角形の正体を知っているか、あるいは「地球外生命体と協力してこれらの飛行する三角形を構築している」という逆行工学の可能性、またはハイブリッドな共同開発を示唆しています。(00:35:49, 00:36:05)

6. 結論と今後の課題​

  • 未解決の謎: 「飛行する三角形」は、その異常な飛行特性、広範な目撃報告、および古代の遺物との関連性から、依然として大きな謎に包まれています。
  • 証拠の必要性: 目撃者の証言や消費者向けのビデオだけでは不十分であり、より決定的な物理的証拠と科学的な分析が求められています。(00:01:04, 00:07:22)
  • 多様な解釈: これらの現象に対する解釈は、「高度な地球製軍用機」から「地球外生命体」、「時間旅行者」によるものまで多岐にわたっており、調査チーム内でも意見が分かれています。

このブリーフィングは、飛行する三角形の現象が、単なるUFOの目撃を超えた、歴史的、科学的、そして哲学的な問いを投げかける複雑なテーマであることを浮き彫りにしています。

目撃情報に見られる特徴​

AI

目撃情報というより大きな文脈において、情報源は飛行する三角形の多くの‌‌特徴‌‌について述べています。これらの特徴は、目撃者や研究者によって、それが地球上の航空機であるという可能性を否定し、説明のつかない現象として強調されています。

以下は、情報源に記載されている飛行する三角形の主な特徴です。

  • ‌‌形状と外観‌‌

    • 多くの場合、「大きな黒い物体」、「巨大な三角形」、「三角形の形をした物体」として説明されます。
    • Mark Olsenの昼間の映像の分析では、「3つのライトを持つ単一の三角形の形をした暗い機体」が示唆されており、映像処理の結果「黒い三角形」がはっきりと示されたこともあります。
    • Speaker 01は、物体の一面に沿って窓を見たとも報告しています。
    • 古くからの遺物や彫刻も、同様の三角形の形状を示しており、これは未来からのタイムシップまたは古代の宇宙飛行士によって飛ばされた機体であるという説につながっています。

  • ‌‌サイズ‌‌

    • 一般的に「巨大」、「大規模」、「巨大な黒い物体」と表現されます。
    • Corningで目撃された機体は非常に「巨大」で、4車線の高速道路を横切ったと報告されています。

  • ‌‌ライト‌‌

    • 多くの場合、「三角形の形に配置された3つのライト」として描写されます。
    • これらのライトは非常に「明るく」、物体自体を「照らして」いたとも言われます。
    • ある目撃者は、底部の「明るい赤いライトが渓流全体を照らした」と述べています。
    • ライトは「等間隔」であり、空を移動しても互いに「固定されたまま」であり、「離れなかった」と特筆されています。
    • 専門家は、Mark Olsenの映像でこれらのライトが「完全に固定された編隊」であることを確認しました。これは、非常に精密なアクロバット飛行でも見られる相対的な動きとは異なります。

  • ‌‌音‌‌

    • 決定的な特徴の一つは、「無音」であることです。
    • 目撃者は、巨大な三角形の物体に非常に接近していたにもかかわらず、「何も聞こえず」、「何も匂わず」、「微風も」「うなり音も」感じなかったと証言しています。

  • ‌‌速度と操縦性‌‌

    • 目撃者によると、「信じられないほど速く」、「猛烈な速度で飛び去る」ことが可能です。
    • あるパイロットは、この物体がSR-71（マッハ3以上で飛行する最速の航空機）よりも「はるかに速く」飛行したと見積もっています。
    • これらの機体は、「ホバリングし、静止し、姿を消し、マッハ5、マッハ8で飛び去る」ことができると説明されています。
    • 垂直に移動したり、水平に移動したり、渓流の最低地点を辿ったり、そして「垂直に上昇」したりすることもできます。
    • ある目撃者は、この物体が通常の航空機であれば落下するような「非常にゆっくりと」飛行していたと述べています。
    • 古代の遺物から作られた模型の分析では、機体は「揚力体」のように機能し、最小限の推進力で空中を滑空できる「グライダー」として設計され、最適化されているように見えることが示されました。その飛行特性は「スペースシャトルの設計を模倣している」とまで言われています。

  • ‌‌目撃された時間帯‌‌

    • 以前は「これらの物体のすべての映像は夜間に撮影されていた」と述べられていましたが、現在は「昼間に撮影された巨大な三角形の驚くべき珍しい映像」も存在します。

  • ‌‌地球外または軍事技術の可能性‌‌

    • 懐疑論者の中には、これらが「誰も見たことのないようなハイテク軍用機」である可能性を指摘する者もいます。過去に飛行する三角形がステルス爆撃機だった事例が20年前にあったことも言及されています。
    • しかし、多くの目撃者や一部の研究者は、これらの特徴（速度、無音性、操縦性）は「人間が作ったいかなる機体とも一致しない」、「私たちの開発したものとは似ても似つかない」ため、地球外の技術であると考えています。
    • F-16が三角形の物体の近くを目撃されたことから、軍事的な関与や政府による監視の可能性も示唆されています。
    • Billは、これらがエイリアンの技術をリバースエンジニアリングした「協調的なハイブリッド機体」である、あるいはエイリアンと人間が協力してこれらを開発しているという仮説を立てています。

これらの特徴は、飛行する三角形が謎の現象であり、その起源（軍事、地球外、あるいは時間旅行）についてさまざまな議論がなされている理由を浮き彫りにしています。

有名な事例​

AI

目撃情報というより大きな文脈において、情報源は‌‌飛行する三角形に関するいくつかの有名な事例‌‌について言及しており、これらの現象の謎めいた性質を強調しています。

特に、以下の事例が「最も有名」として挙げられています。

  • ‌‌ベルギー、1989年‌‌

    • これは飛行する三角形の最も有名な目撃事例の一つとして具体的に言及されています。
    • Mark Olsenの映像と比較され、どちらも三角形の形に配置された3つのライトを持つという共通点があります。
    • しかし、ベルギーの映像はOlsenの映像よりもさらに説得力があるとされています。なぜなら、ベルギーの映像では、3つのライトを所定の位置に保持する物理的な物体、つまり‌‌三角形‌‌が実際に映っていたからです。
    • この事例は、ベルギーで夜間に発生したとされています。

  • ‌‌アリゾナ州フェニックス、1997年‌‌

    • この事例も「最も有名」なものの一つとして挙げられています。
    • コーニングで目撃された機体と共通の特性が指摘されており、‌‌「巨大で、音を立てず、周囲にライトがあり、中央に大きなライトがある」‌‌という特徴が強調されています。
    • この事例も夜間に発生しました。

  • ‌‌イリノイ州ティンリーパーク、2004年‌‌

    • これも「最も有名」な事例の一つとして挙げられており、夜間に発生したと述べられています。

これらの有名な事例は、初期の飛行する三角形の目撃情報の多くが夜間に記録されていたという点も強調しています。しかし、最近では‌‌昼間に撮影された巨大な三角形の珍しい映像‌‌も存在するとされています。

また、情報源はこれらの有名な事例以外にも、飛行する三角形の目撃情報が数多く報告されていることを示しています。

  • ‌‌カリフォルニア州コーニング、1986年‌‌

    • B-2爆撃機が発表される前年。
    • ‌‌「巨大」‌‌で、4車線の高速道路の上を移動した。
    • 半時間以上にわたって‌‌「ホバリング」‌‌しているのが詳細に目撃された。
    • この機体は、「3つのライトが互いに固定された厳密な配置で静かにホバリングし、その後途方もない速度で飛び去る」という、トライアングルアレイで目撃された他の多くの機体と類似しているとされています。

  • ‌‌テキサス州ヒューストン、1996年5月18日‌‌

    • 40年以上の飛行経験を持つベテランパイロット、マイク・デイシックによる目撃。
    • 3つの赤いライトを持つ小さな三角形が、‌‌SR-71（マッハ3以上で飛行する最速の航空機）よりもはるかに速い「猛烈な速度」‌‌で接近し、その後消えたと報告されています。
    • デイシックは、これが訓練で見たどの航空機とも異なると断言しており、地球上の技術ではないと考えています。

  • ‌‌（場所不明）、2001年8月15日‌‌

    • ゴードン・スコットによる目撃で、自宅裏の小川の川床に沿って巨大な黒い三角形が飛んでいくのを目撃。
    • 物体は非常に接近しており（ソフトボールで投げても届く距離）、底部の明るい赤いライトが小川全体を照らした。
    • ‌‌「何も聞こえず、何も匂わず、微風も、うなり音も」‌‌感じなかったという特徴が強調されています。
    • 水平移動だけでなく、垂直上昇・下降も行い、その数分後にはF-16戦闘機が低速で飛行しているのが目撃され、軍事的な関与が示唆されています。

これらの有名な事例やその他の目撃情報は、飛行する三角形が共通して持つとされる‌‌巨大なサイズ、無音の飛行、信じられないほどの速度と操縦性、そして独特なライトの配置‌‌といった特徴を繰り返し示すことで、その起源が地球外である可能性、あるいは未公開の高度な軍事技術である可能性についての議論を深めています。

調査と分析​

AI

「飛行する三角形の謎」というより大きな文脈において、情報源はこれらの未確認飛行物体（UFO）の性質と起源を解明するための‌‌広範な調査と分析‌‌について述べています。その目的は、目撃された現象が地球上のものなのか、地球外のものなのか、あるいはその他の説明があるのかを明らかにすることです。

調査と分析の主な側面は以下の通りです。

  1. ‌‌目撃情報の収集とデータベース化‌‌

    • 世界中で報告されている巨大な三角形の目撃情報が収集されており、特にベルギー（1989年）、アリゾナ州フェニックス（1997年）、イリノイ州ティンリーパーク（2004年）での事例が「最も有名」として挙げられています。
    • カリフォルニアの「トライアングル・アレー」と呼ばれるUFOホットスポットでは、2000年以降だけでも60件以上の三角形UFOの目撃情報が報告されており、これは人口の少ない地域としては非常に多い数だとされています。
    • WUFONの北カリフォルニア州ディレクターであるルーベン・ウリアルテは、この地域のUFOの歴史を調査し、包括的なデータベースを開発しています。
    • 40年以上の飛行経験を持つパイロットの証言など、専門家からの情報も重視されています。パイロットは空を観察する訓練を受けているため、「特別な考慮」が払われます。

  2. ‌‌映像分析‌‌

    • これまでの三角形UFOの映像は夜間に撮影されたものばかりでしたが、今回は‌‌昼間に撮影された巨大な三角形の珍しい映像‌‌（マーク・オルセンの映像）が手に入り、その分析が調査の中心となっています。
    • 画像分析スペシャリストのテレンス・メイソンが、モーション・トラッキング・ソフトウェアを使用して映像を分析しています。彼はマーク・オルセンの昼間の映像の3つのライトを分離・安定化させ、フレームごとに分析しました。
    • 分析の結果、ライトが「完全に固定された編隊」であることが確認され、精密なアクロバット飛行でも見られるような相対的な動きがないことが指摘されました。
    • さらに、画像処理ルーチンを実行したところ、3つのライトの背後と間に‌‌構造物がはっきりと示唆され‌‌、「黒い三角形」が確認されました。これは通常の露出補正によるものではなく、一貫した固体の物体であると結論付けられています。この結果は、1989年にベルギーで撮影された映像が、ライトを保持する「物理的な物体、三角形」を映し出していたことと類似しているとされています。

  3. ‌‌現場調査と物理的測定‌‌

    • 調査チームは、UFOホットスポットである「トライアングル・アレー」の中心にあるライオンズ・ボールド・マウンテンを訪れ、夜間監視を行いました。
    • 将来の記録のために、正確なGPS座標が記録されました。
    • この地域が「ゴールドカントリー」であることから、UFOが金に引き寄せられている可能性という仮説を検証するため、金鉱で放射線と磁気の測定が行われました。
    • ガイガーカウンターと磁力計を使用して「異常なもの」を探しましたが、結果は通常の雰囲気放射線レベルと磁場であり、‌‌異常な数値は検出されませんでした‌‌。これにより、金採掘仮説の裏付けは得られませんでした。

  4. ‌‌古代の遺物と模型実験‌‌

    • 古代のコロンビアで発見されたとされる、戦闘機のように見える「数十億年前の」遺物が提示され、これが様式化された昆虫や鳥ではなく、空力的な設計を持つことを示唆しています。特に、鳥にはない「垂直な尾翼」がある点が強調されました。
    • 特殊効果アーティストのブリック・プライスがこの遺物の正確な模型を作成し、飛行テストを行いました。
    • 模型は変更を加えることなく飛行し、その形状が「揚力体」のように機能し、機体自体が揚力を生み出すことが確認されました。これは「最小限の推進力で空中を滑空できるグライダー」として設計されており、その飛行特性は「スペースシャトルの設計を模倣している」とまで言われています。
    • この模型の飛行能力は、古代の人々が空力学の知識を持っていたか、あるいは同様の三角形の飛行物体を目撃していた可能性を示唆しています。

  5. ‌‌調査チーム内の見解の相違‌‌

    • チーム内には、UFO現象に対する異なる視点が存在します。ビル（SPEAKER_08）やパット（SPEAKER_10）は、地球外生命体や時間旅行の可能性に対してオープンであり、これらの仮説を積極的に探求しようとします。
    • 一方、機械技師のケビン・クック（SPEAKER_02）は、‌‌懐疑的な立場‌‌を取り、より具体的な「物理的証拠」と「科学的な裏付け」を要求します。彼は当初、目撃された物体が「誰も見たことのないようなハイテク軍用機」である可能性を指摘し、多くの証拠が理論や証言に過ぎないと考えています。
    • ケビンは、古代の遺物の模型が飛んだこと自体は古代の空力学の理解を示すものの、それが宇宙人や未来からのタイムシップの存在を証明するものではないと主張しています。

これらの調査と分析を通じて、情報源は飛行する三角形が単なる誤認や自然現象ではない可能性を追求し、その独特な特徴や古代との関連性、そして地球外起源や未公開の軍事技術といったさまざまな仮説を検証しようとしています。しかし、確固たる科学的結論に至るには、さらなる証拠と分析が必要であるという見解も示されています。

時系列​

AI

  • 紀元前10億年頃: コロンビアで、飛行機のような形状を持つ「戦闘機のような」古代の遺物が発見される（ただし、これは考古学者や主流科学者からは「様式化された昆虫や鳥」とされている）。

  • 紀元後500年頃 (1500年前): コロンビアの文化圏で、空飛ぶ三角形の姿を象ったとされるタリズマンや彫刻が作成される。

  • 1896年 - 1897年: サンフランシスコからサクラメント、ストックトンにかけての地域で、「巨大飛行船の目撃情報」が多数報告される。これは三角形UFOの初期の記録と関連付けられる。

  • 1986年: B-2爆撃機が公開される前に、コーニング近郊で巨大な三角形のクラフトがホバリングしているのが目撃され、30分以上にわたって詳細に観察される。

  • 1989年: ベルギーで、3つのライトが三角形を形成するUFOが目撃される。この映像は、後のマーク・オルセンの映像と比較されるほど重要視される。

  • 1996年5月18日、午後1時20分頃: 飛行経験40年のパイロット、マイク・ダシックがヒューストン、テキサス上空で3つの赤いライトを持つ小さな三角形の物体が高速で接近・上昇するのを目撃する。彼はそれが既存の航空機技術では説明できないと断言する。

  • 1997年: アリゾナ州フェニックスで、有名な「フェニックス・ライツ」事件が発生。夜間に巨大な三角形のクラフトが目撃される。

  • 2001年8月15日、午後8時30分頃: ゴードン・スコットが自宅裏の小川沿いで、巨大な黒い三角形の物体を目撃。底部の赤いライトが小川を照らし、音もなく、熱も風もなく、低空を飛行し、垂直に上昇する動きを見せる。その後、F-16戦闘機がこれをエスコートするように飛行しているのが目撃される。

  • 2004年: イリノイ州ティンリーパークで、夜間に三角形UFOが目撃される。

  • 2004年6月15日: パット（SPEAKER_10）がソノラ、カリフォルニアにいる間、マーク・オルセンが昼間に三角形UFOを撮影する。パット自身は映像は撮れなかったが、マークの目撃に立ち会う。

  • 2000年以降: カリフォルニア州の「トライアングルアレー」と呼ばれる地域で、60件以上の三角形UFOの目撃情報が報告される。

  • 現在進行中: 調査チームが飛行する三角形の謎を解明するため、各地での調査や証拠分析を行う。

  • 時期不明: マーク・オルセンの昼間の映像をテレンス・マッソンが分析し、3つのライトを保持する単一の暗い三角形のクラフトである可能性が高いと結論付ける。

  • 時期不明: 調査チームがライオンズボールド山（トライアングルアレーの中心）に登り、夜間にUFOの目撃を試みるが、確認できたのは星、飛行機、衛星のみであった。

  • 時期不明: 調査チームがカリフォルニア州の金鉱山を訪れ、ガイガーカウンターと磁力計を使用して異常な放射線や磁気を調査するが、特に異常は検出されない。

  • 時期不明: ジョルジオ・ツォウカロスがビル・バーンズに古代コロンビアの「戦闘機のような」遺物のレプリカを見せる。

  • 時期不明: ブリック・プライスが古代遺物のレプリカをモデルにした模型を作成し、その飛行実験が行われる。模型は優れた空力性能を示し、ビル・バーンズはこれが古代の飛行三角形の証拠だと主張するが、ケビン・クックは単に古代の空力学の理解を示すものだと反論する。

主要関係者​

AI

  • SPEAKER_08 (ビル・バーンズ?): 本調査の主導者の一人。以前からUFO、特に飛行する三角形の現象を追っており、「爆弾級の」情報や「ビッグピクチャー」を求め、金の存在とUFOの関連性、古代宇宙飛行士説、タイムトラベル説などを熱心に提唱する。ケビン・クックの懐疑的な姿勢には手を焼いている。

  • SPEAKER_10 (パット?): 調査チームの一員。ビル・バーンズと親しい関係にあり、UFO現象、特に三角形UFOのリアリティを強く信じている。マーク・オルセンが昼間の三角形UFOを撮影した際に同席しており、個人的にこの現象の真実性に深く投資している。ケビン・クックの懐疑論には理解を示しつつも、自身の経験を重視する。

  • SPEAKER_02 (ケビン・クック): 調査チームの新メンバーであり、機械エンジニア。フィラデルフィア出身。極めて懐疑的な科学的アプローチを持ち、「実物を見なければ信じない」という立場を貫く。ビルやパットの飛躍した理論に対して常に現実的な視点を提供し、証拠の物理的分析を重視する。自身がUFO捜索のための登山を苦手としていることを示唆する場面もある。

  • SPEAKER_07 (テレンス・マッソン): 画像分析家。マーク・オルセンの撮影した映像を分析し、3つのライトが単一の三角形の物体によって保持されていることを科学的に解明する。

  • SPEAKER_11 (マーク・オルセン): カリフォルニア州ソノラの「スカイウォッチャー」の一人。2004年6月15日に昼間に三角形UFOをビデオ撮影した人物。ジェドと共に長年UFOを監視しており、彼にとってそれは「執着」に近いものだった。

  • SPEAKER_04: 正体不明の目撃者。星を見ていたところ、突然奇妙な形を目撃したと証言する。

  • SPEAKER_01: 複数回目撃された三角形の物体について証言する人物。音もなく滑空する様子や、窓のようなものがあったことを語る。

  • SPEAKER_06 (ルーベン・ウリアルテ): WUFONの北カリフォルニア州ディレクター。この地域のUFOの歴史に関する包括的なデータベースを開発しており、三角形UFOの目撃情報の多さや、エリア51、トーノパ空軍基地との地理的関連性、さらには地下の巨大な洞窟システムと金鉱がUFO活動と関連している可能性を指摘する。

  • SPEAKER_00 (ジョルジオ・ツォウカロス): ビル・バーンズの友人であり、出版社仲間。古代コロンビアで発見された「戦闘機のような」遺物のレプリカをビルに見せ、それが様式化された鳥や昆虫ではなく、飛行機械を描写している可能性を指摘する。彼の理論は古代宇宙飛行士説に傾いている。

  • SPEAKER_05 (マイク・ダシック): 40年以上の飛行経験を持つベテランパイロット（軍隊および民間）。1996年5月18日にヒューストン上空で目撃した高速の三角形UFOについて証言する。彼はそれがSR-71よりも速く、既存の航空機とは全く異なると断言し、その経験からエイリアンの存在を信じるようになった。

  • SPEAKER_09 (ゴードン・スコット): 2001年8月15日に自宅裏で巨大な黒い三角形が音もなく、熱も風もなく低空を飛行し、垂直移動するのを目撃した人物。目撃後すぐにF-16戦闘機がその物体をエスコートしているのを見たと証言する。

  • SPEAKER_12 (ブリック・プライス): 特殊効果アーティスト兼コーディネーター。ジョルジオが提供した古代遺物のレプリカを元に模型を製作し、その飛行テストを行う。彼はその形状から航空機としての性能を確信しており、模型が実際に飛行するのを見て、その空力設計の優秀さに驚きを表明する。

情報源​

動画(44:17)

Giant Triangle UFO_s _ Gold [FULL VIDEO]

文字起こし（話者識別）​

展開

[SPEAKER_08] : Oh my God. What I'm going to tell you is a bombshell. People are hardly seeing flying saucers anymore. You know what they see? (00:00:10)

[SPEAKER_10] : We see this big black thing approaching. These are giants, silent, and some witnesses say incredibly fast. How would you estimate the speed? (00:00:21)

[SPEAKER_02] : Oh boy. What I want to know is, what are these? What the hell is that? (00:00:27)

[SPEAKER_08] : All the videos of these things have been taken at night. (00:00:31)

[SPEAKER_10] : Until now. We have some amazing rare footage of a giant triangle shot in daylight. Where are they? It's going behind the tree now. You didn't see it? (00:00:40)

[SPEAKER_02] : So we analyze the video, and guess what we find out? There's clearly something there. (00:00:47)

[SPEAKER_08] : Evidence has been happening for thousands of years. A pattern. You know what this might all be about? Gold. (00:00:54)

[SPEAKER_02] : Ufologist strikes gold. Retired early. These stories are great, but I need to see the evidence. It's the missing link. (00:01:04)

[SPEAKER_08] : I really want to get to the big picture of flying triangles. I've seen the evidence with my own eyes. I've seen the video. I've heard the witnesses. They can't just be earthly. Where's the proof that these things are actually alien? So there's a new guy on the team. His name is Kevin Cook. He's a mechanical engineer. He's from Philly. Now, he doesn't always agree with me, it's true. I've got my work cut out for me. (00:01:57)

[SPEAKER_02] : They could just very well be some sort of high-tech military aircraft that nobody's seen before. (00:02:03)

[SPEAKER_08] : Sure, a high-tech military aircraft that can both hover, stay stationary, go invisible, and shoot off at what? Mach 5, Mach 8? Come on. (00:02:13)

[SPEAKER_10] : You know, I like this guy. (00:02:15)

[SPEAKER_02] : A similar type of thing happened before about 20 years ago when people were seeing flying triangles in the sky. And it was just a stealth bomber. The same thing could be happening again right now with a different experimental craft. It doesn't necessarily mean it's alien. (00:02:29)

[SPEAKER_10] : Kevin's coming from that place where a lot of scientists and engineers come from. It's a place of nuts and bolts where they don't believe it unless they can actually see it. Well, you guys want evidence. That's what we're doing. We're going into a UFO hotspot that's famous for triangle UFOs. And I know it's true because I was actually there a couple years ago where I met with a sky watcher who actually videotaped one of these daylight triangles while I was there. So you saw it? (00:02:51)

[SPEAKER_10] : Yeah. Well, no, I didn't see the triangle, but I was with a guy who videotaped the triangle when it happened. So I know the phenomenon is real. This is going to be a challenge. (00:02:59)

[SPEAKER_02] : There's not a lot of physical evidence that I can get my hands on here. I'm working mostly with these theories that Bill and Pat are throwing out. Somebody needs to make sure that they don't go over the edge and they stay grounded in reality. (00:03:12)

[SPEAKER_08] : We will hear things that will convince even the most diehard skeptics that flying triangles are real, that there's an alien connection that's unmistakable. And I suspect we may even discover why they're here. If we can show him what we know to be true, what the documents say, what the witnesses say, what the video says. If we can get him to see that for what it is, we may actually have a real scientific edge to our entire investigation. We are in the grips of an unusual phenomenon. (00:03:52)

[SPEAKER_08] : All over the world, people have been seeing giant triangles. The most famous, Belgium, 1989. Phoenix, Arizona, 1997. Tinley Park, Illinois, 2004. All of them at night. But now new breaks in the investigation of these unexplained triangular craft. We've uncovered rare, never before seen daytime footage taken in an area of California known as Triangle Alley. (00:04:26)

[SPEAKER_11] : There's three lights in triangular formation, very bright. They're massive. They're flying so slowly over us that if it were a conventional aircraft, we'd fall out of the sky. (00:04:39)

[SPEAKER_08] : So we are going to talk to Mark and Jed, two sky watchers here in Sonora, California, who've had some incredible daytime and nighttime sightings of flying triangles. (00:04:57)

[SPEAKER_10] : It was June 15, 2004. When I was here, on that balcony right there with you, we were looking at the sky up there and you videotaped a real triangle during daylight hours. (00:05:09)

[SPEAKER_11] : Oh my God. I've got three lights in a triangular formation. Are you sure? Yes, this is, this is, this is, oh my God. (00:05:19)

[SPEAKER_10] : I was right there next to him and I was, you know, I was fumbling with my camera, but by the time I got everything up and running, this thing was gone. You missed it. I missed it, unfortunately, but Mark was there and I'm telling you guys this really happened. (00:05:31)

[SPEAKER_02] : Pat's telling me he missed it, which makes me wonder if what he saw was even a UFO or maybe it was just a plane. (00:05:37)

[SPEAKER_10] : Now, this is Kevin's first investigation, so I understand that he's skeptical. You know, I'm a little nervous because this is the first time in our years of investigating UFOs that I was actually at a sighting. I'm personally invested in this and I'd be really embarrassed if this turns out to be nothing but a small airplane. And these lights, they were equidistant. (00:05:58)

[SPEAKER_11] : It seemed like it was from one solid figure. Yes, and they didn't vary as they moved across the sky. They stayed fixed. What the hell is that? Are you sure? It's behind those branches. You didn't see it? Oh my God. The lights did not move away from each other. They were equidistant. All I could think of is, this is not of this world. These UFOs originated back behind this ridge. Are you aware of any Air Force bases, maybe just an airport? (00:06:30)

[SPEAKER_11] : Over on the other side of this ridge is Columbia Airport. It's a very small airport. They don't even have radar. What about military? The only military base is Castle over in Merced, and it's closed. Well, people might be tempted to ask, why is it that you both see so many UFOs? I've watched for literally thousands of hours for a few minutes of footage. This was more than just a hobby. Oh, for a while there, it became an obsession, almost. (00:07:00)

[SPEAKER_11] : Just wanting to know what they are. Sounds like it paid off. Sort of, yeah. I still don't know what they are. I still want to find out. But we have daytime footage. That's just so incredibly rare. I hope it can be analyzed independently, so we can see what these are. (00:07:15)

[SPEAKER_10] : I know that Kevin doesn't buy this, but I was there, and we captured something amazing. (00:07:22)

[SPEAKER_02] : I know Pat thinks this is real, but I need something more than witness testimony and consumer-grade video. We need to analyze this footage to see what it really is. (00:07:33)

[SPEAKER_08] : The Mark Olsen video is really interesting, not just for what it is, but because it's so reminiscent of the video shot in Belgium in 1989. Both the Olsen video and the Belgium video were three lights in a triangular formation. But the Belgium video was even more compelling than the Olsen video, because the Belgium video actually showed a physical object holding the three lights in place. A triangle. I believe that if Terence Masson has a chance to analyze this Mark Olsen video, what he's going to see is an object holding the three lights together. (00:08:19)

[SPEAKER_08] : That's our next stop, Terence Masson's lab. (00:08:22)

[SPEAKER_02] : Terence Masson is an image analyst, and he'll be using motion tracking software to isolate and stabilize the three lights in Mark Olsen's daytime footage. We're going to analyze Mark's video frame by frame to get some answers. (00:08:40)

[SPEAKER_07] : So what I've done here first is cropped out the majority of the frame so we can concentrate on the object itself and stabilize it. You can tell definitively here, these things are rock solid in formation. This is a good solid four and a half seconds. And even the tightest precision acrobatic flying, you're going to see some kind of relative motion over that kind of time frame. Can we eliminate the obvious things? (00:09:06)

[SPEAKER_07] : Is this some type of helicopter? Is there any evidence of that? Well, without having 100% certainty, I can come up with a long list of things that make this not anything like conventional aircraft. Going away from the running footage now, we've got single still frames, isolated, and I've run some image processing routines on this. And look at what's coming. We see some clear indication of a structure behind and between those three lights. Whoa! And... black triangle? (00:09:41)

[SPEAKER_07] : I mean, there's clearly something there. (00:09:44)

[SPEAKER_02] : Is there any other explanation that the darkness around these lights is something other than a solid object? (00:09:53)

[SPEAKER_07] : Many times we've seen in these consumer grade camcorders, the exposure range for the pixels that capture this information are very, very limited. And sometimes we do get blooming effects. So next to very bright lights, it'll tend to compensate and go very dark. That's not what we're seeing here. It's too consistent over too long of footage. What's your best guess? What are we looking at? My best guess would be we're looking at a single triangular-shaped dark craft with three very large either propulsion or illuminating lights. (00:10:24)

[SPEAKER_07] : That's not consistent with any man-made craft. (00:10:29)

[SPEAKER_02] : We're heading up to Lyons Bald Mountain, which is right in the heart of Triangle Alley and the ideal location to hopefully see what Mark Olson filmed. This Triangle Alley actually extends for 350 miles around the Sierra Nevada Mountains. From here in Sonora, California, heart of the Gold Rush country, to further up north at Mount Shasta. I'll be honest with you, I'm really anxious to look in the sky for UFOs. But I'm more concerned about keeping my footing on these rocks. (00:11:05)

[SPEAKER_02] : There's a lot of loose rock, it's steep, there's snow on the ground, and we're carrying heavy packs full of gear. Now, Pat, he's the wilderness guy. Me, I'm more comfortable in the city, so this is a bit more of an adventure than I anticipated. (00:11:20)

[SPEAKER_10] : Well, if this spot is as hot as Mark says it is, there's a good chance we might actually see something. A lot of people say UFOs don't exist, but they're the same people who never actually come out and watch the skies themselves. So we're going to take a crack at it, and we're going to spend the night out here and see if we see something. What do you think about this spot right here? (00:11:42)

[SPEAKER_10] : It's a good spot. Well, here's the ridge. That's the silver mine. If we're going to see anything, it's going to be from right here. I don't think you can get hotter than this place right here. So let's set up the camera, and maybe you take the GPS readings. Yeah. Right now, Kevin's pounding in a marker that will take a GPS reading. All set. (00:12:06)

[SPEAKER_10] : So that in the future, we can look back at our records and know exactly where we were, should we see a triangle tonight. (00:12:12)

[SPEAKER_02] : North, 38 degrees, 7 minutes, 50.2 seconds. West, 120 degrees, 5 minutes, 45.6 seconds. Got it. We're in the right place. This is where witnesses report seeing a flying craft. Triangle Alley. It's right here. If we do catch something on camera, it's done right. We have the right camera set up, and we'll be able to analyze it very well. That is our goal. Do you see that light just above the ridge? (00:12:47)

[SPEAKER_02] : It goes white, then red. Yeah, I see it. Are we onto something? (00:12:52)

[SPEAKER_04] : I was just looking at the stars, and then all of a sudden, I see this shape. It's kind of like... (00:13:04)

[SPEAKER_02] : We've been on top of the mountain in the middle of Triangle Alley, and we've been watching the sky all night long. What we were hoping to find up here is actual proof of these flying triangles, something we can see with our own eyes and capture on film. I honestly think that we should be focusing most of our attention along the horizon instead of up high. Most of the witness reports have them coming from behind a ridge and then disappearing behind a ridge just over the course of seconds. (00:13:38)

[SPEAKER_10] : If we see something moving, I think our eyes will be drawn to it automatically. I hope so. It's dark out here, and it's by far the coldest night I've ever spent looking for UFOs. One thing's for sure, your mind definitely plays tricks on you. Do you see that light just above the ridge? (00:13:55)

[SPEAKER_02] : It goes white, then red. Yeah, I see it. Are we on the sky? So we found something in the sky, and we don't know what it is. It's bright. It seems to be moving very slowly. Possibly it's a star. It looks like it might be moving. I'm not too sure. (00:14:12)

[SPEAKER_10] : Well, it's right above the ridge. It seems to be flickering. I think it's a star that's coming up over the ridge. Well, I got something actually on my phone, a little application that has a star map on it. And it'll tell us what that little star is, if that is a star. Tell me what it is. So let me calibrate here. We're looking at Orion here. So let's bring it down here, and let's see what it says. (00:14:40)

[SPEAKER_10] : According to this, that star could be Pollux. (00:14:44)

[SPEAKER_02] : We've been out here most of the night, and we've seen some things. But so far, they've just been airplanes and satellites and stars our eyes are playing tricks on. So I can totally see how people can get really excited from things they see in the sky that are just casually explained. (00:15:03)

[SPEAKER_01] : Multiple triangular-shaped objects have been reported in this general area. These objects were in view of multiple witnesses. What these things can do is just amazing. Just amazing. (00:15:22)

[SPEAKER_08] : I'm going to meet with Ruben Uriarte, WUFON's Northern California State Director. He has been researching the history of UFOs in this area and has developed one of the most comprehensive databases available. We're going to get the really big picture of flying triangles, what they are and who's flying them. (00:15:44)

[SPEAKER_06] : We've been getting so many reports of sightings, an increased spike of triangles especially. We consider it like an intersection to what we call Triangle Alley, which is from Southern California all the way up to the Washington border. Nevada is right next door. We have Area 51, which is approximately 260 miles away. Taunapal Air Force Base, another black-budget base, possibly 200 miles away. (00:16:09)

[SPEAKER_08] : So the Nevada test site is only about 250 miles away. That's like the blink of an eye for some of the multiple-mark supersonic aircraft we have. In Triangle Alley, there have been over 60 reported sightings of triangle UFOs only since the year 2000. This is a huge number of sightings for such a sparsely populated region. Imagine the number of sightings that have gone unreported. (00:16:36)

[SPEAKER_06] : Here's a triangle. Now, this is 1986, Bill. This is before they released the B-2 bomber. Obviously, the characteristics are a lot different. They're huge. This thing went right over a freeway, four lanes in width. So where was this? This is further north up here near Corning. What's really interesting is this thing was just hovering. And witnesses actually observed in detail, as you can see, over half an hour. (00:17:03)

[SPEAKER_08] : This craft in Corning is similar to hundreds of other videos we've seen right here in Triangle Alley. It's three lights. Three lights that may look separate, but they're in this rigid configuration with each other. They hover silently in the sky. Then they shoot off at tremendous speeds. We've got to find out what is the link among all these different craft. (00:17:30)

[SPEAKER_06] : This reminds me of Phoenix. Yes. All the same characteristics that we keep hearing about. They're large, they're silent. They make no sound whatsoever. Lights around the perimeter. The lights illuminated the object. Major light in the center. (00:17:46)

[SPEAKER_08] : When you compare planes to this, when you compare helicopters to this, they look, they behave entirely different. (00:17:53)

[SPEAKER_06] : How long have these been going on? It goes back probably to the great airship sightings back in 1896, 1897. From San Francisco to Sacramento all the way to Stockton around the general vicinity. There was reports from miners that were working at seeing strange objects, strange stars. The other thing that's unique about this area, Bill, is there's a large cavernous system that stretches throughout the state. Particularly right here in this area for several hundred miles up toward the Shasta area. This area is loaded with minerals. (00:18:27)

[SPEAKER_06] : You know, it's gold country. (00:18:29)

[SPEAKER_08] : When he said gold country, I stopped in my tracks. Gold? Could it be that simple? Whoever or whatever is flying these triangles could be interested in gold. (00:18:42)

[SPEAKER_06] : We've been focusing a lot on extraterrestrial, but perhaps the other answer to this whole mystery is inner earth. Gold has very, very high conductivity. (00:18:53)

[SPEAKER_08] : We use gold in circuits. So we should be looking down at the same time we're looking up. And if we find something there that can actually possibly draw UFOs to it. I consider Sonora like the intersection. It's a beacon here. Here's what we know. It's not just Sonora, it's the entire Sierra Nevada range. It's not just flying triangles, it's all sorts of objects. It's not just now, it's a hundred years. (00:19:22)

[SPEAKER_08] : Maybe it's the gold in these hills that's been attracting flying triangles for well over a hundred years. (00:19:30)

[SPEAKER_10] : So my concern is that tomorrow's headlines will be, UFOlogist trapped in mine after earthquake. You think that's possible? (00:19:42)

[SPEAKER_02] : You got it all wrong. The headline is going to be, UFOlogist strikes gold, retires early. (00:19:49)

[SPEAKER_10] : We're on our way to an actual working gold mine here in the Motherlode region of Northern California. This sits right in the path of where Mark Olson had his sighting. We'll be testing for high levels of radiation and magnetism, invisible energies that might attract UFOs to this region. Oh, okay. (00:20:12)

[SPEAKER_02] : Looks like that's it right there. Sweet. We have a magnetometer and a Geiger counter, and we're going to look for anything out of the ordinary. You think we'll find anything? I actually do expect to get some readings, at least for the magnetometer. Should pick up some magnetic fields from iron. To tell you the truth, I'm excited that this is a gold mine. I'm very excited. However, my entire life I've been purposefully trying to stay out of small places like caves and whatnot, so I am a little bit nervous. (00:20:41)

[SPEAKER_02] : Ready? It's a little bit smaller than I expected. But, as long as I stay focused on the task at hand, everything's going to be fine. Oh, man. Why am I thinking about bats? (00:20:54)

[SPEAKER_08] : I'm here meeting with my good friend, fellow publisher, Giorgio Tsoukalos. I've got the missing. There's something in flying triangles that goes all the way back to ancient times. (00:21:09)

[SPEAKER_00] : I've actually got something that might make your triangle mystery a bit less mysterious. This artifact, like here, was actually found in Colombia, and it's pre-Colombian and about a billion years old. A dozen of these have been found, and to the untrained eye, this looks like a fighter jet. Mainstream archaeologists and mainstream science basically says that this is nothing but a stylized insect or a stylized bird. From my biological perspective, wings on a bird are exactly where we have our arms. (00:21:50)

[SPEAKER_00] : They're attached to the shoulder girdle. In this example right here, the wings are not attached to the shoulder girdle, so biologically speaking, this is not a bird. One thing that is extremely interesting here is the upright tail fin. Birds do not have upright tail fins. Their tail fins are horizontal. This is incredible. (00:22:19)

[SPEAKER_08] : Giorgio was actually showing me representational artwork of triangular shapes that the ancients used as talismans. How would a Colombian culture from 1,500 years ago even understand aerodynamically what a tail fin does, right? (00:22:38)

[SPEAKER_00] : Unless they saw something, but they couldn't explain it entirely, and so not only did they put a whole bunch of stuff in writing, but they also recreated stuff. They said, you know, our heirs should be able to look at these things so that we don't forget what has happened during their time. Can you say it? (00:23:05)

[SPEAKER_08] : It's the missing link between the ancients' vision of flying triangles in the sky and our vision of what flying triangles can be and what we've actually reverse-engineered for our own aircraft. Either people from another world came here with those, or, even more stunning, somebody was time traveling. (00:23:27)

[SPEAKER_05] : It's been a long time that I've had doubts about whether there were UFOs or aliens visiting us from outer space. Right over the roof, I saw three red lights and a very small triangle, and it was coming pretty fast, and the triangle was getting bigger. From what I saw, I don't think that anyone on this planet has the technology right now to be able to do that. (00:23:54)

[SPEAKER_01] : This is the mother load. In the last 20, 30 years, I've probably investigated 400 sightings. I'm just trying to figure out why they're here. (00:24:10)

[SPEAKER_10] : It's a little bit more narrow than I expected. Yeah, pretty low, too. We're in California gold country to investigate the theory that aliens are mining our gold to use as an electrical conductor to power their craft. If it's true, we should find high levels of radiation and magnetism, trace evidence which has been found at the scene of several UFO landings. All right, let's go. (00:24:37)

[SPEAKER_02] : We're traveling down this mine, and I have to admit, I'm a little bit nervous. It's dark, it's narrow, and I'm willing to bet that there are bats in here. Well, this looks like the end of the mine right here. This is as far as it goes. This will be perfect. Let's start with the Geiger counter. And then work with the magnetometer. Look for anything unusual. A Geiger counter measures the number of radioactive samples detected per minute. (00:25:02)

[SPEAKER_02] : And standard atmospheric radiation levels are about 15 counts per minute. (00:25:06)

[SPEAKER_10] : Now, ufologists claim that abnormally high levels of radiation are a residual effect of UFO contact. Now, if there are high levels of radiation in there, I think it's safe to say we're not going to be hanging out for very long. Are you getting something? (00:25:21)

[SPEAKER_02] : No, everything seems normal. Not much deviation from normal atmospheric radiation. Now, in the mine, we detected nothing abnormal. Nothing that was any different from standard atmospheric radiation levels. So next, we're going to try using a magnetometer, which measures the changes in a magnetic field in the mine. And it's reported that UFOs are actually attracted to high levels of magnetism. I'm getting anything from zero to five milligauss on the magnetometer. And is it just jumping around, or is it consistent in one place? (00:25:56)

[SPEAKER_02] : It's jumping around. Just like the Geiger counter, the magnetometer readings were all normal. This gold mine is dry. Just because gold is one of the best conductors of electricity, that's not proof that aliens are coming here to get it. (00:26:10)

[SPEAKER_10] : A number of experts have hypothesized that there is a connection between heavy mineral deposits, particularly gold, and UFO activity. It's just a theory. You're smiling at me like I'm insane. (00:26:25)

[SPEAKER_02] : What do you think, am I nuts? Pat's suggesting that UFOs are actually hovering above the mountains and somehow extracting the resources they need from the mountains themselves. That just sounds like Star Trek to me. I'd much rather focus on the Geiger counter and the magnetometer and looking for any unusual readings than thinking about Pat's unusual theory. If there are beings from another planet and they wanted resources, I can see it being sensical that they would actually come here and just take ours. They don't even have to fight us. (00:26:56)

[SPEAKER_02] : Still, it's just a theory. (00:26:57)

[SPEAKER_10] : Exactly, but one that's worthy of investigation, don't you think? That's why we're here. (00:27:03)

[SPEAKER_02] : That's what's exciting about this investigation. You get a lot of leads, some will take you to a dead end, and some take you to a gold mine. (00:27:09)

[SPEAKER_08] : While you guys were out in the field, I was meeting with Giorgio Tsoukalos. He showed me a replica of an artifact of a flying triangle. These carvings were found in caves. They were found throughout South America. And this is basically, what, a thousand years old? Fifteen hundred years old? Legend has it that these types of craft were flown by ancient astronauts. We don't know where they came from, we don't know who they are, we don't know if they're from the future, they're from another planet, we just don't know. (00:27:44)

[SPEAKER_02] : You're telling me that fifteen hundred years ago, there were aircraft in the sky, flying around, and people were making models of them, and drawing them, making little trinkets just like this? (00:27:56)

[SPEAKER_08] : Indigenous peoples on planet Earth were visited by ancient astronauts, flying craft just like this, triangular shaped craft, visiting planet Earth and seeding the culture with information. A possibility? It could also be a time ship. (00:28:12)

[SPEAKER_02] : Bill says that these ancient astronauts are actually time ships from the future. Come on, time traveling, it just doesn't exist, at least not today. This is just science fiction. (00:28:26)

[SPEAKER_08] : Flying triangles from the future, from our future, going back in time, they see them, they're seeding the past, and they did something, maybe something religious, maybe something cultish, we don't know. (00:28:38)

[SPEAKER_02] : Time traveling, we're talking about time traveling here. Some sort of vehicle traveling from the future into the past. That's it? Is there any kind of proof behind this, or is it simply a theory? (00:28:51)

[SPEAKER_08] : I'm telling you that twenty years ago, an army officer traveled into the future. We have that totally documented. Is there proof that these ships are coming back from the future? No. I have to say, this is why I love Bill. (00:29:06)

[SPEAKER_10] : He doesn't hold back. A hundred years ago, people laughed at the idea that we would be able to fly in airplanes. People laughed at Charles Darwin for proposing the theory of evolution. So, you know, when Bill Burns proposes the theory of time travel, I don't think I can laugh it off. (00:29:22)

[SPEAKER_02] : Regardless what inspired the design of this trinket, it is a triangle, and it does look like it might be aerodynamic. I propose that we make a model identical to this right here out of styrofoam or something like that. Just throw it in the air like a glider. See if it flies. You got it. Sounds good. (00:29:40)

[SPEAKER_05] : It's been a long time that I've had doubts about whether there were UFOs or aliens visiting us from outer space. From what I saw, I don't think that anyone on this planet has the technology right now to be able to do that. (00:30:00)

[SPEAKER_08] : We are now in Houston, Texas, about to meet with a pilot with over 40 years of experience. He saw a triangle in the sky that he still can't explain. (00:30:13)

[SPEAKER_05] : And what exactly is your background in flying? Well, I have 40 years of flying, both military and commercially. I've flown probably 25 or 30 different airplanes. (00:30:25)

[SPEAKER_02] : Pilots make excellent witnesses. These are professionals that are trained to observe the sky. When a pilot sees something and he doesn't know what it is flying through the sky, we have to give it special consideration. (00:30:36)

[SPEAKER_05] : It was the 18th of May, 1996, and it was about 1.20. I caught something out of my eye and I just looked off to the left like that. And right over the roof, I saw three red lights and a very small triangle. And it was coming pretty fast and the triangle was getting bigger. It was almost like it might have been climbing a little bit because it didn't follow the curvature of the Earth. It just disappeared into infinity. (00:31:06)

[SPEAKER_05] : How would you estimate the speed? Oh, boy. I've seen the Sputnik and watched it for quite a while. I know the SR-71 and believe me, even a 71 couldn't go as fast as that. (00:31:24)

[SPEAKER_02] : Mike Dasik has seen the SR-71 in person. This is the fastest airplane ever built. It goes up to speeds of Mach 3+, that's 2,400 miles per hour. And what Mike Dasik saw in the sky was much faster than that. (00:31:40)

[SPEAKER_10] : It's really hard for me to imagine that this experienced pilot with more than 30 years in the cockpit would not be able to identify the SR-71. Did you have any special training in identifying foreign aircraft or enemy aircraft? (00:31:54)

[SPEAKER_05] : Oh, yeah, that was part of your training. You had these black silhouettes that flashed up on the screen and you would just say P-51, F-15. You didn't want to be shooting down your own airplanes. What you saw that night was not one of the silhouettes you saw in your training? Oh, absolutely not. (00:32:11)

[SPEAKER_10] : No way. It's very exciting talking to Mike because he's a trained expert in identifying foreign and enemy aircraft. And when he says he doesn't know what's flying up there, I have to believe him. This was a genuine unidentified triangle and he says it's not ours. Well, what would you say it was today? (00:32:27)

[SPEAKER_05] : For the first time in my life, I really think that I saw something very unusual. I might not have believed before that there were aliens visiting with us, but now I believe there are. (00:32:42)

[SPEAKER_02] : I honestly don't know what's going on. Before hearing this testimony, I was leaning towards these flying triangles being military aircraft. But now I don't know what to think. (00:32:54)

[SPEAKER_10] : Since our investigation into triangle UFOs, we've received hundreds of emails from people who've seen these crafts. Among them was Gordon Scott, who witnessed a huge black triangle flying along the creek bed behind his home. He was reluctant to appear before cameras, but he's reached a comfort level with us and is now agreeing to come forward and speak about what he saw. (00:33:23)

[SPEAKER_09] : When we first saw this thing going down the creek, we were scared to death. We were getting ready to call 911. This took place in 2001, August 15th, at about 8.30 p.m. We run out to our backyard and we see this big black thing approaching. The bright red light on the bottom lit up the whole creek, probably 100 feet across. And I assumed it was an aircraft ditching. I could have hit it with a softball underhanded. (00:33:50)

[SPEAKER_09] : That's how close you were? That's how close. (00:33:51)

[SPEAKER_02] : What kind of noise did you hear? Nothing. Did you feel any heat? No. Did you feel any breeze? No. Did you smell anything? No. He was so close to this giant triangle, yet he heard nothing. He smelled nothing. He felt nothing. Not a breeze. Not a hum. Nothing at all. I find it kind of suspect. He was so close and this was such a large object. (00:34:14)

[SPEAKER_09] : Then where did it go? Followed the creek. Stayed at the lowest point possible. Went right over here to the base of the bridge. And it just went vertical like this, over the bridge about 15 feet above it, maybe 20. Then it dropped right back down in the creek. (00:34:30)

[SPEAKER_02] : It's moving horizontally and it's moving vertically. As far as I know, we don't have any technology today that can do that. But to tell you the truth, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that we do. (00:34:42)

[SPEAKER_09] : Within about five minutes, we had an F-16. It was flying very slow, gear up. It was fully armed. It had two sidewinders on the wings. It had two more missiles underneath. (00:34:52)

[SPEAKER_10] : Minutes after sighting this strange flying triangle, Gordon saw an F-16, which tells me that there is some kind of military involvement with this craft. Either the government knows what these triangles are and is involved with them, or these flying triangles are completely out of our control and do not belong to our government and we are monitoring their activity. (00:35:12)

[SPEAKER_09] : It wasn't chasing the black triangle. I believe it to be an escort. It was flying with it. Now, we got NASA just down the road. It's not that far from here. Is NASA the direction where the thing was heading? Yes. It came from the north. (00:35:27)

[SPEAKER_08] : It was headed to the south. 30 miles east of Gordon Scott's house is Johnson Space Center, home to NASA. What does it mean that an F-16 is following this giant triangle towards NASA? So, guys, what do you think about some of these cases that we've been hearing? (00:35:49)

[SPEAKER_02] : I would say both of them are baffling. Gordon Scott, to me, obviously kind of seems like a military aircraft. Just flying low, F-16 guiding it. There's a lot of things that point to that. What if it's some kind of cooperative hybrid craft that we're developing with E-Team? (00:36:05)

[SPEAKER_08] : Actually working with extraterrestrials to build these flying triangles. Actually working with extraterrestrial technology. Not with extraterrestrials on board, but with their technology. Kind of Area 51 reverse engineering. What if we've been doing that for years? (00:36:19)

[SPEAKER_10] : Well, Bill has a theory that aliens and humans are collaborating on creating this reverse engineered technology. I think we have to be careful about how far we want to go with these theories that aliens are working with us secretly. Until I can find some kind of definite proof, I'm afraid Bill's alone on this one. I mean, we're just trying to figure out if these are military or extraterrestrial. I think that going all the way to hybrid already is kind of jumping the gun a little bit. (00:36:46)

[SPEAKER_10] : Don't you think? Why? It's been going on since World War II. I need something to hold on to. Where's the evidence? I mean, it's great in theory. It could be. It could be the case. These could all be extraterrestrial, but I don't have the proof that I need to prove that, other than their weird flight characteristics. I just think we have to keep our speculation in check. (00:37:03)

[SPEAKER_02] : We really don't have proof that there are alien craft that we are reverse engineering. (00:37:07)

[SPEAKER_08] : The proof is what Gordon Scott saw. He saw something that, given your description of what people have been talking about, behaved like nothing we've ever developed. What do you need? (00:37:17)

[SPEAKER_02] : What do you need? It's not so far out that it is conceivable that we could actually have these kinds of craft. I wouldn't be surprised to find out we do have this technology, the type of thing that Gordon Scott saw today. Let's go see Britt. (00:37:32)

[SPEAKER_08] : We're about to meet with special effects artist and coordinator, Brick Price. Brick has modeled the relic that Georgia gave us the other day. And we're going to find out, does that object really fly? We're wondering, will this fly? (00:37:59)

[SPEAKER_12] : Can this fly? Given the shape, I would say so, definitely. There's no question in my mind. Just from looking at this, you're already convinced that this is some sort of aircraft, it's aerodynamic, and it's going to fly. There's too many things about the shape that I think represent flight in our time. (00:38:15)

[SPEAKER_02] : Well, it looks like you changed your model from the original a little bit. It looks like it's streamlined. Did you make any changes to the angle of attack on the wing or the distance, the height, the weight, the center of gravity? What kind of changes did you make? None. None? No. Talking to Brick, I fully expected that he was going to say, we needed to make some changes to this model in order to get it to fly properly. We needed to change the angle of the wing. (00:38:39)

[SPEAKER_02] : We needed to change the distance here, the distance there, the center of gravity. But he didn't. He didn't need to change anything. This thing apparently flies on its own. (00:38:47)

[SPEAKER_12] : I can't wait to see it. One thing that's interesting about it is that this, the wing swept area, is taken up a lot by the body. But the body has a shape to it like a lifting body, which means that the wing, the body itself actually acts as a lifting surface. (00:39:03)

[SPEAKER_02] : The structure of the body is actually a lifting body. It's comparable to the angle of an aircraft wing, which means while it's in flight, it's actually creating lift to lift the entire object. What this means is that this artifact seems to be designed and optimized as a glider so it can go through the air with minimal propulsion. As aerodynamic as it is, and maybe it flies as well as you're saying, it just, it's too perfect. That's what makes me a believer. (00:39:29)

[SPEAKER_10] : If the model actually flies... Alright, launch away. Let's see this thing fly. It's possible that they had knowledge of extraterrestrial craft. (00:39:39)

[SPEAKER_01] : The object, triangular shape, we saw windows along one side of it, and it just glided by. No sound, absolutely no sound. (00:39:54)

[SPEAKER_08] : We were at the lab of Special Effects Supervisor Brett Price in Los Angeles, California, who has made an exact scale model of Giorgio's artifact. If this model flies, we can have our final piece of proof that alien visitation has been going on for thousands of years. Alright, launch away. Let's see this thing fly. (00:40:16)

[SPEAKER_10] : If the model actually flies, then we really have to reconsider what we believe about ancient civilizations and what they knew. And it's possible that they had knowledge of aerodynamics, of flying machines, and maybe, you know, maybe extraterrestrial craft. (00:40:35)

[SPEAKER_12] : Oh, look at that. That's fantastic. That flew. It's starting to lift. It's starting to lift. That's good. (00:40:45)

[SPEAKER_02] : That flew a lot better than I wanted it to. I'm sorry, Kevin. Wow, this model flew and did a lot better than I ever expected, and I kind of have a conflict. I wasn't sure that this was actually modeled after a real aircraft. Now, I don't know what to think. (00:41:04)

[SPEAKER_08] : The relic flies. Not only does it fly, the inherent aerodynamic qualities of this are so intense that it stalls, rights itself, and settles down. We're looking at proof of ancient flying triangles. This design is made to form that angle of attack just like the way the space shuttle comes down to its landing. I also think it's interesting that it didn't dive at all. It didn't dive, it didn't flip. It didn't go up in the air, it didn't come back down on its tail. (00:41:35)

[SPEAKER_08] : When we saw this thing in flight, its tail dropped, its nose went up, and it settled down to gather the lift. Quite frankly, this mimics the space shuttle's design. But you ask yourself, how could the indigenous peoples living in Colombia 1,500 years ago have conceived of a device like this, a gliding device? There's one answer, which is implausible, but more plausible than anything else. Time travel. You've got to be impressed of the aerodynamics of this design. (00:42:06)

[SPEAKER_08] : Oh, I can't deny it. And if that is the exact replica of what Giorgio gave us the other day, that tells you a lot about what they saw. (00:42:14)

[SPEAKER_02] : Something from outer space? Possible. There's nothing that points to that, in my opinion. I'm leaning towards that these ancient artifacts, these little trinkets, are modeled after some sort of highly advanced aerodynamic toy. And that's all this is. (00:42:29)

[SPEAKER_08] : What's with Kevin Cook? I mean, he's watching this thing fly, and even as it's landing perfectly, he's doubting the significance of what we've shown. What is he saying? Doesn't show anything. Doesn't show there were ancient astronauts. Doesn't show flying triangles were flying over South America 2,000 years ago. Doesn't show anything. Hello? (00:42:51)

[SPEAKER_02] : I wish Bill would take time to think about what this test actually proves. It has nothing to do with airships in the sky from the future, from another planet. All it says is that there was an understanding, way back when, of aerodynamics. And that's special enough in itself. (00:43:07)

[SPEAKER_10] : Well, I'll tell you what this means to me. It means that somehow, long ago, some ancient peoples came up with a design that's perfectly aerodynamic. How they came up with that idea, I really can't say. And there's no way we can conclude that. But it opens up possibilities. Were those people seeing the same triangular craft that we're seeing today? Well, now we have to be open to that possibility. (00:43:32)

[SPEAKER_08] : So here's what we found out. People all over the world are seeing these giant triangles. Pilots tell us they're capable of speeds and maneuvers more advanced than anything out there. And we have proved that ancient peoples may have seen something similar. This is one huge piece of the puzzle. But there's more. We've just got this amazing footage of triangles shot less than a hundred miles from where we were in Triangle Alley. (00:44:11)

(2025-09-15)